The Legal 500

Twitter Logo Youtube Circle Icon LinkedIn Icon

CMS

Offices

Other ranked firms

The following firms have provided more information to help you choose the right firm.


Spain

Banking and finance

Jones Day

Araoz & Rueda

Hogan Lovells International LLP

ONTIER

Capital markets: Debt

Ramón y Cajal Abogados

DLA Piper LLP

Simmons & Simmons

Baker McKenzie

Capital markets: Equity

White & Case LLP

Ramón y Cajal Abogados

Latham & Watkins LLP

Pérez-Llorca

Commercial, corporate and M&A

Araoz & Rueda

DLA Piper LLP

BROSETA Abogados

Deloitte Legal

Dispute resolution

ECIJA

Simmons & Simmons

Andersen Tax & Legal

GTA Villamagna Abogados

B. Cremades & Asociados

Latham & Watkins LLP

Roca Junyent

BROSETA Abogados

RCD

Eversheds Sutherland Nicea

ONTIER

Araoz & Rueda

EU and competition

Gómez-Acebo & Pombo

Baker McKenzie

Employment

Deloitte Legal

Clifford Chance

Gómez-Acebo & Pombo

Industry focus: TMT

Bird & Bird

RCD

Hogan Lovells International LLP

Pérez-Llorca

Eversheds Sutherland Nicea

Insurance

Blanco & Asociados Abogados

KPMG Abogados

Intellectual property: Copyright

Jones Day

DLA Piper LLP

Augusta Abogados

Roca Junyent

Intellectual property: Trade marks

Fieldfisher JAUSAS

Eversheds Sutherland Nicea

DA Lawyers

Private equity

BROSETA Abogados

Ventura Garcés & López-Ibor

Araoz & Rueda

Dentons

Projects and energy

Dentons

Araoz & Rueda

Public law

DLA Piper LLP

GTA Villamagna Abogados

RCD

Baker McKenzie

Real estate and construction

Simmons & Simmons

ONTIER

Cases&Lacambra

Ventura Garcés & López-Ibor

Roca Junyent

Araoz & Rueda

GTA Villamagna Abogados

Squire Patton Boggs

BROSETA Abogados

Restructuring and insolvency

Baker McKenzie

Simmons & Simmons

DLA Piper LLP

Pérez-Llorca

Tax

Araoz & Rueda

Simmons & Simmons

Eversheds Sutherland Nicea

Ramón y Cajal Abogados

Andersen Tax & Legal

Dentons

Ventura Garcés & López-Ibor

White-collar crime

Jones Day

Simmons & Simmons


Legal Developments by:
CMS

  • Access to justice: protective costs orders in planning challenges

    Third parties and competing developers have no rights of appeal to the Secretary of State against planning decisions. Disappointed applicants can appeal to the Secretary of State and can have the merits of the application reconsidered. The only remedy available to a disappointed third party is a challenge by way of judicial review in the High Court on a point of law. The sense of frustration and disempowerment this creates has not been helped by the increasing complexity of the planning process and the use of consultation to legitimise decisions that many perceive may already have been taken.
    - CMS Group

Legal Developments in Spain

Legal Developments and updates from the leading lawyers in each jurisdiction. To contribute, send an email request to