The Legal 500

Twitter Logo Youtube Circle Icon LinkedIn Icon

CMS

Offices

Other ranked firms

The following firms have provided more information to help you choose the right firm.


Germany: Banking and finance

Financial services: regulatory

GSK Stockmann

Investment funds

Debevoise & Plimpton LLP

Heuking Kühn Lüer Wojtek

White & Case LLP

Lending and borrowing

DLA Piper

Baker McKenzie

Project finance

Hogan Lovells International LLP

White & Case LLP

Germany: Capital markets

Debt capital markets

Hogan Lovells International LLP

Sullivan & Cromwell LLP

Equity capital markets

Pinsent Masons Germany LLP

Heuking Kühn Lüer Wojtek

Germany: Compliance

Internal investigations

Debevoise & Plimpton LLP

Germany: Corporate and M&A

Corporate

Heuking Kühn Lüer Wojtek

Baker McKenzie

DLA Piper

M&A: large deals (€500m+)

Hogan Lovells International LLP

Jones Day

M&A: mid-sized deals (sub-€500m)

Norton Rose Fulbright

Dechert LLP

Hogan Lovells International LLP

Germany: Insurance

Advice to insurers

Clifford Chance

DLA Piper

Hogan Lovells International LLP

Insurance litigation

Heuking Kühn Lüer Wojtek

Germany: Media

Entertainment

Greenberg Traurig Germany

Noerr

Greenberg Traurig Germany

Press and publishing

DLA Piper

Germany: Private equity

Transactions

Noerr

Hogan Lovells International LLP

Venture capital

Hogan Lovells International LLP

Germany: Real estate and construction

Construction (including construction litigation)

GSK Stockmann

Arnecke Sibeth Dabelstein

Real estate

Jones Day

White & Case LLP

Latham & Watkins LLP

DLA Piper

Dentons

King & Spalding LLP

GSK Stockmann

Germany: Transport

Maritime and shipping

Arnecke Sibeth Dabelstein

Fleet Hamburg LLP

Ince

Ince


Legal Developments by:
CMS

  • Access to justice: protective costs orders in planning challenges

    Third parties and competing developers have no rights of appeal to the Secretary of State against planning decisions. Disappointed applicants can appeal to the Secretary of State and can have the merits of the application reconsidered. The only remedy available to a disappointed third party is a challenge by way of judicial review in the High Court on a point of law. The sense of frustration and disempowerment this creates has not been helped by the increasing complexity of the planning process and the use of consultation to legitimise decisions that many perceive may already have been taken.
    - CMS Group

Legal Developments in Germany

Legal Developments and updates from the leading lawyers in each jurisdiction. To contribute, send an email request to