The Legal 500

Back to Legal500 home

Stewarts Law LLP

9 BOND COURT, LEEDS, LS1 2JZ, ENGLAND
Tel:
Work 0113 222 0022
Fax:
Fax 0113 222 0044
DX:
26428 LEEDS PARK SQUARE.
Web:
www.stewartslaw.com
Email:
London, Leeds

What we say about the firm's legal practice in Yorkshire and the Humber

Dispute resolution

Within Commercial litigation: Leeds, West Yorkshire, Stewarts Law LLP is a third tier firm,

Stewarts Law LLP is increasing its capabilities in this area, and was boosted by the arrival in late 2009 of Jonathan Sinclair from Eversheds LLP. Sinclair is ‘very intelligent, analytical and clear thinking’.

Insurance

Within Clinical negligence: claimant, Stewarts Law LLP is a third tier firm,

Stewarts Law LLP works on complex, high-value cases, with a particular focus on catastrophic injuries. The ‘dedicated and knowledgeable’ Frank Pinch heads the team in Leeds.

Within Personal injury: claimant , Stewarts Law LLP is a second tier firm,

Stewarts Law LLP is ‘outstanding in personal injury litigation’, and has recently been instructed in a significant number of spinal cord and brain injury cases. The ‘resolute, committed and extremely able’ Daniel Herman, who leads the team, acted in a high-profile personal injury case in 2010, in which the award was the highest ever reported, at £11.15m.

Overview

Private client

Within Family: Leeds and West Yorkshire, Stewarts Law LLP is a third tier firm,

Stewarts Law LLP’s team is ‘efficient and professional’, and acts for numerous high-net-worth individuals in matters including complex jurisdictional disputes. Simon Preston, who heads the group, is ‘professional, with a wealth of experience’.

Further information on Stewarts Law LLP

Please choose from this list to view details of what we say about Stewarts Law LLP in other jurisdictions.

London

Offices in London

Yorkshire and the Humber

Offices in Leeds

Search News and Articles

Legal Developments in the UK

Legal Developments and updates from the leading lawyers in each jurisdiction. To contribute, send an email request to

  • COUNCIL TAX

    In Harrow LBC v Ayiku [2012] EWHC 1200 (Admin) Sales J held that the word “or” in the Council Tax (Exempt Dwellings) Order 1992, art 3 Class N, had a disjunctive meaning, therefore it was sufficient for the non-British spouse of a foreign student to satisfy one or other of the two conditions, namely being prevented from taking paid employment or being prevented from claiming benefits, in order to qualify as a “relevant person” who was exempted from liability to pay council tax.
    - 11KBW

  • QUEEN’S SPEECH

    Bills already introduced pursuant to the Queen’s Speech on 9 May 2012 include Local Government Finance Bill and Electoral Registration and Administration Bill, both accompanied by Explanatory Notes, which in each case address ECHR compatibility.
    - 11KBW

  • Standards

    In R (Calver) v Adjudication Panel for Wales [2012] EWHC 1172 (Admin) Mr Calver was a member of Manorbier Community Council who successfully challenged the decision of the Panel to dismiss his appeal against a decision by Prembrokeshire County Council Standards Committee censuring him for a number of comments or blogs posted by him on a website he owned and controlled.
    - 11KBW

  • A justified retrospective

    Clive Sheldon - QC debates the pros & cons of retrospective tax legislation
    - 11KBW

  • Public Sector Equality Duty (“PSED”)

    In R (Greenwich Community Law Centre) v Greenwich LBC [2012] EWCA Civ 496 the Court of Appeal held that the Council had had “due regard to the PSED when making changes to its funding of community legal advice services”. At para 30 Elias LJ said:
    - 11KBW

  • Public Sector Equality Duty

    Surrey County Council conducted a review of its Library Service. This culminated in a Report to the Council’s Cabinet. The Recommendations in the Report included that there should be consultation about a community-partnership approach at selected Libraries.
    - 11KBW

  • Judicial Review

    The Judgment of Lindblom J in The Manydown Co Ltd v Basingstoke and Deane BC [2012] EWHC 977 (Admin) repays attention. The Claimant sought to challenge by judicial review 2 decisions of the Council: (1) the Council’s refusal to reconsider its position on the development of a site that it owns (and is the subject matter of a Joint Development Partnership Agreement with the Claimant); and (2) a decision of the Council’s Cabinet approving a selection of sites for development which did not include this site.
    - 11KBW

  • The Health and Social Care Act 2012: impact on adult social services

    After its torrid passage through Parliament, the Health and Social Care Bill received Royal Assent on 27 March 2012. The Act deals principally with healthcare reform, but it also contains some amendments to the legislative framework for social care. It will come into force on a day yet to be appointed by the Secretary of State.
    - 11KBW

  • Immigration update May 2012

    In this issue:
    - Penningtons Solicitors LLP

  • Premium service for tier 2 and 5 sponsors to be launched

    A premium service for sponsors will be launched by the UKBA on 6 April 2012. The service is designed specifically for companies that sponsor international employees under tier 2 and 5 of the points based system and aims to provide them with enhanced support.
    - Penningtons Solicitors LLP
© 2012 www.legal500.com