Gatehouse Chambers is particularly well-versed in commercial landlord and tenant work as well as development matters. Members of the set are also recognised for expertise in property cases which intersect professional negligence and construction issues. John de Waal KC is representing the tenant in Into Nominee Ltd v Study Group UK, which will address whether cladding defects allow a tenant to argue that a lease been compromised and therefore ended. Brie Stevens-Hoare KC is leading Byroni Kleopa in Kedai Ltd & ors v Sterling Estates Ltd, a large claim by 18 companies concerning a number of flats and mixed developments which centred around alleged repudiatory breach, breach of fiduciary duty, fraud and negligence.
Legal 500 Editorial commentary
Testimonials
Collated independently by Legal 500 research team.
- We tend to use this Chambers as our first port of call in looking for value for money.
- One of my favorites: User-friendly, sensibly priced, and no prima donnas.
- My go-to set. Great range of top-notch counsel and outstanding clerking.
- Very good all-around set for a broad range of property and chancery matters.
- The clerks are great, in particular Jim Findley. He understands the benefits of long-term relationships. He's commercial, responsive, and hard-working.
- Gatehouse Chambers is a fantastic set with a collective mindset of client service at the forefront of their minds. There is a wide array of legal and practical knowledge within the set.
- The clerks are effortlessly helpful, and nothing is ever too much for them. The speed of responses is unmatched.
- Excellent depth of junior counsel, with some standout individuals. They always have counsel available even on short notice. They frequently give insightful seminars and briefings.
- Very strong, friendly, and commercial clerking. In particular, Jim Findley can be relied on even for the most urgent instructions.
- Jim Findley is a standout clerk. Nothing is too much trouble, and he's really sensible and commercial.
Lawyers
Leading Silks
KCs at the very top of their field, with a long-established record of market-defining cases, and widespread endorsement from clients and peers. All silks appointed in the last two rounds are listed further below.
Leading Juniors
Leading juniors are those with significant experience of key cases, strong market recognition from both peers and clients, and are seen as future candidates for silk.
Gemma de Cordova
Gemma is measured, calm, professional, and a safe pair of hands. She is completely unflappable, and clients are assured by her calming presence. Her advocacy is eloquent and persuasive.
Lina Mattsson
Lina is a fantastic barrister to work with. She is proactive and very much a part of the team. She is relatable and brilliant at assuring clients of her investment in the outcome of their disputes. She is also laser-focused when cross-examining and delivers fantastic outcomes as a direct result of her combination of technical skills and being a brilliant advocate.
Emily Betts
A KC in the body of a junior. Whip-smart, with a forensic eye for detail and great on her feet.
Daniel Gatty
Daniel is calm and considered. His advocacy is thoughtful and persuasive.
Laura Tweedy
Laura is devoted to her clients and effortlessly goes above and beyond to deliver, and even exceed, expectations. She is approachable, friendly, and a very strong advocate in court. I have no hesitation in recommending her.
She has recently become an accomplished mediator as well. While I have not yet had the opportunity to appoint her as a mediator, my colleagues have and speak very highly of her skills.
John Clargo
Always well prepared. Always approachable. A very good lawyer who connects with the client and is able to identify and deliver their objectives. Deals with paperwork promptly. His assured advocacy and ability to assess the situation will always command the attention of the judge.
Katrina Mather
Katrina is an excellent advocate; she is very calm on her feet and can adapt under pressure. She is also incredibly personable and great with clients.
Jack Dillon
Jack is first-rate: robust, decisive, commercially astute, and always completely across the detail. He gives clear, practical advice and has excellent litigation judgment, knowing which points to take and which to leave alone. His advocacy is excellent - firm, tenacious, and persuasive, without ever overplaying the position. He is very well received by judges and is particularly impressive when dealing with unexpected points off the cuff.
Faisel Sadiq
Faisel is clear and thorough. He is measured and fair, and this approach is maintained in his advocacy. The litigation is ongoing, but I was present to hear Faisel argue a very technical application, which we won.
Carl Brewin
Carl is incredibly calm and is able to take some of the emotion out of the litigation, enabling clients to make fully informed decisions. His approach to advocacy is also very calm and matter-of-fact.
Cameron Stocks
Cameron is incredibly proactive and engaged with instructions. He grasps matters quickly and is incredibly knowledgeable and pragmatic.
Cameron's advice is thorough, clear, and well-reasoned.
His advocacy is persuasive, and he excels at thinking on his feet and dealing with new matters on the day.
Cameron is also incredibly valuable in his approach, as he is always on hand to assist clients. He can adapt his advice to suit lay clients as well as sophisticated clients.
David Peachey
David is my go-to counsel on complex and knotty cases. He combines sharp legal analysis with practical judgment and consistently delivers clear, strategic advice.
Byroni Kleopa
Joshua Griffin
Josh is an unflappable advocate - very calm, collected, and in control of the law and facts of the case. He inspires confidence in the client.
Amanda Eilledge
Amanda has the experience and eye for detail to help flag potential issues at an early stage, aiding the selection of successful strategies.
Clare Anslow
Monty Palfrey
Monty always makes himself available to talk through a matter on the telephone. He is very good at thinking of alternative options for matters. He is very knowledgeable about residential possession matters. He is a very calm and organized advocate.
Andrew Skelly
Andrew demonstrates clear and well-structured advocacy, presenting arguments persuasively and engaging effectively with the court. He is also friendly and easy to work with.
John Beresford
John has a very measured and calm advocacy style. He is charming and polite yet very effective. His legal analysis is excellent.