4 Pump Court features expertise across a wide variety of professional negligence cases, in particular those within the construction and technology sectors, as well as international cases. Several members of the set are involved in the Grenfell Tower litigation, including Aidan Christie KC and Lynne McCafferty KC, who are instructed in relation to cladding issues. Sean Brannigan KC represents a fire consultant on the case, while Luke Wygas leads on the delay element of one of the claims and Matthew Thorne acts as specialist construction counsel to the Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea. Simon Davenport KC has been instructed on behalf of the claimant in Shahraab Ahmad v Ouajjou, a case which raises questions on the professional duties of investment advisers overseas. Simon Hale KC took silk in 2025.
Legal 500 Editorial commentary
Testimonials
Collated independently by Legal 500 research team.
- 'Paul Bloxham is proactive attentive personable and commercial.'
- '4 Pump Court is one of the best sets in London. Excellent commercial work and a great clerking team.'
Lawyers
Leading Silks
KCs at the very top of their field, with a long-established record of market-defining cases, and widespread endorsement from clients and peers. All silks appointed in the last two rounds are listed further below.
Sean Brannigan KC
‘An outstanding advocate who is a joy to watch. It appears to come effortlessly and he seems to have the ear of the court.’
Michael Douglas KC
Nigel Tozzi KC
‘Nigel thorough and able to master heavy detail, especially on quantum aspects. He is user-friendly and mindful of underlying commercial objectives.’
Aidan Christie KC
‘Aidan has meticulous attention to detail and provides very helpful advice. His drafting is first class, as is his advocacy.’
James Leabeater KC
Lynne McCafferty KC
Lynne is clever, logical and hardworking. She has a nice way with clients, she is approachable and engaged.’
Jeremy Nicholson KC
Benjamin Pilling KC
2025 Silks
KCs at the very top of their field, with a long-established record of market-defining cases, and widespread endorsement from clients and peers. All silks appointed in the last two rounds are listed further below.
Leading Juniors
Leading juniors are those with significant experience of key cases, strong market recognition from both peers and clients, and are seen as future candidates for silk.
Simon Henderson
James Purchas
‘James has excellent analytical skills, he is a man for detail, both in terms of absorbing facts and in identifying all the issues such that one can rely on his advice. He is also very thorough on the pleadings.’
Kate Vaughan-Neil
‘Kate manages situations with confidence and aplomb, providing reassurance, focus and firm guidance. Kate rises to the challenge of the unexpected, relishing the creative freedom and nailing her client's objectives every time.’
Luke Wygas
‘Down to earth and user-friendly, he is a team player and a pleasure to work with.’
James Bowling
‘James is charming and great with clients. He leads a case with creativity and thoroughness and he has incredible knowledge of case authorities’
Martyn Naylor
‘Martyn is incredibly diligent and knowledgeable on all matters involving contracts and insurance. He is a polished and persuasive advocate and great to work with on long term, complex court proceedings.’
Peter Oliver
‘ Peter is a forceful advocate, he delivers clear and straightforward advice on complex matters. He is user-friendly, polite and professional, personable and engaging.’
Quentin Tannock
Matthew Thorne
‘Matthew is good on the detail and being able to convey very difficult and technical legal contractual points to the client.’
Neil Dowers
Neil is a brilliant strategist, an exceptional intellect and persuasive advocate.’
Jennie Gillies
'She gets to the root of the issues with lightening speed and is very highly regarded by clients. Her oral advocacy is commanding and persuasive.'
James Hatt
‘James is a very understated but able barrister whose powers of analysis and ability to formulate an argument are formidable. ’
Mek Mesfin
‘Mek is an excellent advocate, he gets to grips with issues quickly and presents arguments both written and orally in a clear, persuasive and effective way. He has really excellent knowledge of technical construction law issues, and can deal with professional negligence and insurance issues with ease. ’