Described as ‘the leading set on shareholder and LLP disputes,’ Serle Court’s members take on High Court and arbitration proceedings concerning LLP and L.P. disputes, with particular expertise in the financial services sector. In addition to his advocacy, 2024 saw John Machell KC sought out by a number of private equity partnerships requiring assistance in navigating sanctions regimes. James Mather is noted for his expertise in matters at the intersection of partnership and fraud, while Tom Braithwaite acts for parties in both law firm and medical partnerships.
Legal 500 Editorial commentary

Testimonials

Collated independently by Legal 500 research team.

  • 'The clerks are very helpful and easy to deal with.'
  • 'Operates highly efficiently - a pleasure to deal with.'
  • 'The leading set on shareholder and LLP disputes. Great depth and breadth.'
  • 'Serle Court is a standout set for commercial chancery work, they understand the pressures of litigation and are flexible and pragmatic in approach. This makes working with Serle Court efficient and straightforward from start to finish.'

Lawyers

Leading Silks

KCs at the very top of their field, with a long-established record of market-defining cases, and widespread endorsement from clients and peers. All silks appointed in the last two rounds are listed further below.

1
John Machell KC
‘John brings a calm authority to proceedings. His submissions are invariably well-judged, precise, and delivered with measured gravitas. He combines intellectual rigour with commercial pragmatism, which makes him especially valuable in cases where litigation and settlement strategy need to be aligned.’
2
Jonathan Adkin KC
2
Philip Jones KC

Leading Juniors

Leading juniors are those with significant experience of key cases, strong market recognition from both peers and clients, and are seen as future candidates for silk.

1
Jennifer Haywood
2
Tom Braithwaite
‘Tom combines excellent legal and procedural knowledge with an authoritative and reassuring manner for clients. He is great in court, with a reasonable and measured style being very effective against opposition cases pitched rather high.’
2
James Mather