Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 20 FEBRUARY 2023

Stolen Cryptoassets: Further Guidance On Injunctions And Jurisdiction

In Osbourne v Persons Unknown & Others,the High Court of England and Wales confirmed that there is ‘at least a realistically arguable case' that non-fungible tokens are to be treated...

United StatesTechnology

In Osbourne v Persons Unknown & Others,the High Court of England and Wales confirmed that there is 'at least a realistically arguable case' that non-fungible tokens are to be treated as property as a matter of English law and that their inherently unique nature makes them suitable objects of prohibitory injunctions.

The Court also held that it is 'strongly arguable' that when a cryptoasset is stolen from a victim located in England, a constructive trust arises that is governed by English law. Further, if that cryptoasset is subsequently transferred to others, the question of whether they are constructive trustees is also a matter of English law. As such, the Court has jurisdiction over claims against those subsequent recipients of the stolen cryptoasset regardless of their location.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from