Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 10 NOVEMBER 2016

Fifth Circuit Decision Raises Uncertainty About Computer Fraud Coverage For Vendor-Impersonation E-Mail Scam

Vendor impersonation is one of the typical varieties of "Business E-mail Compromise" (BEC) scams.

United StatesTechnology

Vendor impersonation is one of the typical varieties of "Business E-mail Compromise" (BEC) scams. In spoofing the e-mail of a trusted vendor, the fraudster persuades a company to redirect its vendor payments to a fraudulent bank account. While courts have found that commercial crime policies cover loss from BEC scams, a recent Fifth Circuit decision found no coverage for the victim of a vendor-impersonation BEC scam under the computer fraud provision of the company's crime protection policy. Rejecting the company's arguments that the coverage provision was ambiguous, the court held that the fraudulent e-mail was not the cause of the fraudulent transfer. Orrick attorneys Russell Cohen, Aravind Swaminathan, and Harry Moren comment on this troubling decision at our sister blog, Trust Anchor.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from