Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 11 FEBRUARY 2025

Deep Dive Into Tornado Cash

Cahill Gordon & Reindel LLP
Cahill Gordon & Reindel LLP
Contributor
Cahill Gordon & Reindel LLP

Cahill Gordon & Reindel LLP

Opened in 2000, Cahill London has been advising clients for more than 25 years on a broad range of...

View firm profile
Explore more from Cahill Gordon & Reindel LLP

The recent decision by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit in Van Loon, et al. v. Dep't of the Treasury, 122 F.4th 549 (2024) held that the U.S. Department of the Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets Control...

United StatesTechnology
Cahill Gordon & Reindel LLP
Cahill Gordon & Reindel LLP
Author LinkedIn connections

The Nuances of Immutability and its Legal Implications

The recent decision by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit in Van Loon, et al. v. Dep't of the Treasury, 122 F.4th 549 (2024) held that the U.S. Department of the Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) exceeded its statutory authority by sanctioning the suite of smart contracts (i.e., computer code) comprising Tornado Cash—a decentralized, open-source privacy protocol that facilitates anonymous cryptocurrency transactions—because such smart contracts are not "property" subject to the sanctions jurisdiction asserted by OFAC within the meaning of the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA). A central argument in the decision was the perceived "immutability" of the Tornado Cash smart contracts, with the court emphasizing that "once a smart contract becomes immutable, no one can reclaim control over it." However, a closer technical examination reveals that the notion of

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from