Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 09 OCTOBER 2025

Blocking The Blocked Income Rules? Loper Bright's Influence Over The Eighth Circuit's 3M Decision.

Crowell & Moring LLP
Crowell & Moring LLP
Contributor
Crowell & Moring LLP

Crowell & Moring LLP

Crowell & Moring’s Doha office is a full service legal practice that serves as the firm’s regional...

View firm profile
Explore more from Crowell & Moring LLP

On October 1, 2025, the Eighth Circuit decided 3M Co. v. Commissioner in the taxpayer's favor, based on its application of Loper Bright.

United StatesTax

On October 1, 2025, the Eighth Circuit decided 3M Co. v. Commissioner in the taxpayer's favor, based on its application of Loper Bright. The question presented in the case was whether the IRS had the authority to reallocate royalty income to a U.S. parent company that its foreign subsidiary was prohibited from paying under foreign law. The court held that the best interpretation of the governing statute did not permit the IRS's reallocation.

3M is the U.S. parent company of a multinational group and licenses intellectual property to its global subsidiaries. At issue in this case was the application of the Blocked Income Rules under Treas. Reg. § 1.482-1(h)(2) ("Blocked Income Rules") to the license and royalties between 3M and its Brazilian subsidiary, because a Brazilian law capped the amount of royalties that a Brazilian subsidiary may pay to a non-Brazilian parent company. In this case, 3M's Brazilian subsidiary paid $5.1 million for the use of 3M's intellectual

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from