Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 19 OCTOBER 2026

Tracking Pixels On Automated Website Held Not To Violate Washington Privacy Act

Benesch, Friedlander, Coplan & Aronoff LLP
Benesch, Friedlander, Coplan & Aronoff LLP
Contributor
Explore more from Benesch, Friedlander, Coplan & Aronoff LLP

In Baker v. Seattle Children’s Hospital, the Washington Supreme Court held that consumers’ clicks and searches on a fully-automated website are not communications “between two or more individuals” under the Washington...

United StatesPrivacy

Key Takeaways

  • In Baker v. Seattle Children’s Hospital, the Washington Supreme Court held that consumers’ clicks and searches on a fully-automated website are not communications “between two or more individuals” under the Washington Privacy Act.
  • The decision substantially limits WPA claims based on website tracking technologies, providing businesses with a strong defense against a growing wave of pixel-tracking litigation.
  • Businesses should continue to evaluate their use of tracking tools, particularly on customer-facing forms, chat functions, and logged-in platforms, as questions remain regarding how the WPA applies to other types of online interactions.

Earlier this week, the Washington Supreme Court unanimously affirmed dismissal of a putative class action alleging that Seattle Children’s Hospital violated the Washington Privacy Act (WPA), RCW 9.73.030, by using Meta Pixel on its public website. Baker v. Seattle Children’s Hosp., No. 104590-5, 2026 WL 3023818 (Oct. 8, 2026).

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from