Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 04 SEPTEMBER 2026

Zafirov Update: Eleventh Circuit Sides With Relators On Appointments Clause, But Article II Challenges Remain

Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.
Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.
Contributor
Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.

Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.

Mintz is a litigation powerhouse and business accelerator serving leaders in life sciences, private...

View firm profile
Explore more from Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.

On September 1, 2026, the Eleventh Circuit issued its long-awaited decision in United States ex rel. Zafirov v. Florida Medical Associates, vacating the district court’s ruling that the False Claims Act’s (FCA) qui tam provisions violate the Appointments Clause of Article II.

United StatesLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

On September 1, 2026, the Eleventh Circuit issued its long-awaited decision in United States ex rel. Zafirov v. Florida Medical Associates, vacating the district court’s ruling that the False Claims Act’s (FCA) qui tam provisions violate the Appointments Clause of Article II. The court found that FCA relators are not “Officers of the United States” because they do not occupy a “continuing position established by law,” and therefore are not subject to the Appointments Clause’s requirements. The Eleventh Circuit’s decision aligns with decisions from other circuits rejecting similar Appointments Clause challenges, but it is the first to do so since Justice Thomas’s dissent in United States ex rel. Polansky v. Executive Health Resources.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from