Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 14 JULY 2017

The Why Of Cross-Examination

Our next series of columns will address the subject of cross-examination.

United StatesLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Daniel Small is a Partner for Holland & Knight's Boston office.

Our next series of columns will address the subject of cross-examination. Dan Small recently returned from his second trip to Uzbekistan, talking with judges and lawyers there about the adversarial system.

We'll give Dan the floor to share some thoughts.

"Why have cross-examination?" It seems an odd question, given our justice system's longstanding and fundamental reliance on the process. Yet before we discuss the "how" of cross-examination, let's consider the "why."

This process that we take for granted in court is, after all, somewhat unnatural: You would not subject a friend or co-worker to intense grilling before deciding whether to believe something he told you. Why do so here?

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from