Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 06 MARCH 2009

Supreme Court Docket Report - Decision Alert - March 3, 2008

Mayer Brown
Mayer Brown
Contributor
Mayer Brown

Mayer Brown

Mayer Brown is a leading international law firm positioned to represent the world’s major...

View firm profile
Explore more from Mayer Brown

The doctrine of standing arises from Article III of the U.S. Constitution, which limits the power of courts to the decision of “Cases” and “Controversies.”

United StatesLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Originally published March 3, 2009

Keywords: US Supreme Court, Summers v. Earth Island Institute, standing, Neguise, immigration, persecution bar

Today the Supreme Court issued a decision, described below, of interest to the business community.

Summers v. Earth Island Institute, No. 07-463 (previously discussed in the January 21, 2008 Docket Report).

The doctrine of standing arises from Article III of the U.S. Constitution, which limits the power of courts to the decision of "Cases" and "Controversies." The doctrine requires that a plaintiff allege actual or threatened injury that is concrete and particularized, such that action by a federal court will protect the plaintiff's interests. Today, in Summers v. Earth Island Institute, No. 07-463, the Supreme Court held that the standing doctrine prevents a plaintiff from challenging agency regulations in the absence of a live dispute over a concrete application of the regulations.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from