Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 25 OCTOBER 2010

Supreme Court Docket Report – October 12, 2010

Mayer Brown
Mayer Brown
Contributor
Mayer Brown

Mayer Brown

Mayer Brown is a leading international law firm positioned to represent the world’s major...

View firm profile
Explore more from Mayer Brown

Chapter 28 of the United States Patent Act, 35 U.S.C. § 271(b), provides that whoever actively induces infringement of a patent shall be liable as an infringer.

United StatesLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Originally published October 12, 2010

Keywords: Patent Act, patent holders, active inducement

Today the Supreme Court granted certiorari in one case of interest to the business community:

Patent Act—Required State of Mind for a Claim of Active Inducement

Chapter 28 of the United States Patent Act, 35 U.S.C. § 271(b), provides that whoever actively induces infringement of a patent shall be liable as an infringer. The Supreme Court granted certiorari today in Global-Tech Appliances, Inc. v. SEB S.A., No. 10-6, to determine the mental state that must be proven to impose inducement liability under 35 U.S.C. § 271(b).

The Court's resolution of this case will be of considerable interest to patent holders and manufacturers. If the Court holds that a plaintiff must prove that the defendant had actual knowledge of the infringed patent, inducement liability will be more difficult to establish than if the Court adopts a deliberate-indifference standard instead.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from