Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 27 MAY 2010

Supreme Court Decision Alert - May 24, 2010

Mayer Brown
Mayer Brown
Contributor
Mayer Brown

Mayer Brown

Mayer Brown is a leading international law firm positioned to represent the world’s major...

View firm profile
Explore more from Mayer Brown

In a decision that could prove significant to all businesses that engage in joint ventures and other cooperative enterprises, the Supreme Court ruled today in "American Needle, Inc. v. National Football League", No. 08-661, that the National Football League (NFL) does not constitute a "single enterprise" for antitrust purposes, holding instead that the league’s 32 constituent teams are separate enterprises when it comes to selling branded items like caps.

United StatesLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Originally published May 24, 2010

Keywords: single entity immunity, American Needle, NFL, licensing agreement, EEOC charge, ERISA, attorney fees

Today the Supreme Court issued three decisions, described below, of interest to the business community.

  • Antitrust—"Single Entity" Immunity
  • Title VII—Time Limit to File EEOC Charge
  • ERISA—Attorney's Fees

Antitrust—"Single Entity" Immunity

American Needle, Inc. v. National Football League, No. 08-661 (previously discussed in the June 29, 2009 Docket Report)

In a decision that could prove significant to all businesses that engage in joint ventures and other cooperative enterprises, the Supreme Court ruled today in American Needle, Inc. v. National Football League, No. 08-661, that the National Football League (NFL) does not constitute a "single enterprise" for antitrust purposes, holding instead that the league's 32 constituent teams are separate enterprises when it comes to selling branded items like

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from