Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 08 MARCH 2016

Supreme Court Decision Alert - March 7, 2016

Mayer Brown
Mayer Brown
Contributor
Mayer Brown

Mayer Brown

Mayer Brown is a leading international law firm positioned to represent the world’s major...

View firm profile
Explore more from Mayer Brown

Today, the Supreme Court held that, for purposes of diversity jurisdiction, an unincorporated legal entity has the citizenship of its members (including its shareholders)—even if the entity is labeled a "trust."

United StatesLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Today, the Supreme Court issued one decision, described below, of interest to the business community.

Federal Diversity Jurisdiction—Citizenship of Unincorporated Entities

Americold Realty Trust v. ConAgra Foods, Inc., No. 14-1382

Today, the Supreme Court held that, for purposes of diversity jurisdiction, an unincorporated legal entity has the citizenship of its members (including its shareholders)—even if the entity is labeled a "trust."

Federal courts have jurisdiction over controversies between "citizens" of different States. 28 U.S.C. § 1332(a)(1). For purposes of diversity jurisdiction, a corporation is considered a citizen of the State in which it is incorporated and the State in which its principal place of business is located. 28 U.S.C. § 1332(c). The Supreme Court has long held that an unincorporated legal entity, such as a joint-stock company or a legal partnership, is a citizen of every State in which any of its members are citizens. Carden

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from