Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 04 MARCH 2015

Supreme Court Decision Alert - March 3, 2015

Mayer Brown
Mayer Brown
Contributor
Mayer Brown

Mayer Brown

Mayer Brown is a leading international law firm positioned to represent the world’s major...

View firm profile
Explore more from Mayer Brown

Supreme Court Decision Alert - March 3, 2015

United StatesLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Today, the Supreme Court issued one decision, described below, of interest to the business community.


Tax Injunction Act—Application to Suits Challenging State Notice And Reporting Requirements

Direct Marketing Ass'n v. Brohl, No. 13-1032 (described in the July 1, 2014, Docket Report)

The Tax Injunction Act provides that "[t]he district courts shall not enjoin, suspend or restrain the assessment, levy or collection of any tax under State law where a plain, speedy and efficient remedy may be had in the courts of such State." 28 U.S.C. § 1341. Today, in Direct Marketing Ass'n v. Brohl, No. 13-1032, the Supreme Court held that the Tax Injunction Act does not bar federal courts from exercising jurisdiction over a suit to enjoin the informational notice and reporting requirements of a state law that neither imposes a tax nor requires collection of a tax.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from