Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 25 MARCH 2015

Supreme Court Decision Alert - March 24, 2015

Mayer Brown
Mayer Brown
Contributor
Mayer Brown

Mayer Brown

Mayer Brown is a leading international law firm positioned to represent the world’s major...

View firm profile
Explore more from Mayer Brown

Securities Act of 1933—Misstatements in SEC Registration Statements; Lanham Act—Preclusive Effect of Trademark Trial and Appeal Board Determinations

United StatesLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Today, the Supreme Court issued two decisions, described below, of interest to the business community.

  • Securities Act of 1933—Misstatements in SEC Registration Statements
  • Lanham Act—Preclusive Effect of Trademark Trial and Appeal Board Determinations

Securities Act of 1933—Misstatements in SEC Registration Statements

Omnicare, Inc. v. Laborers District Council Construction Industry Pension Fund, No. 13-435

Section 11 of the Securities Act of 1933 grants a right of action to investors who allege that they have purchased securities in reliance on a registration statement that "contained an untrue statement of material fact or omitted to state a material fact required to be stated therein or necessary to make the statements therein not misleading." 15 U.S.C. § 77k(a). Today, the Supreme Court vacated a Sixth Circuit decision that had allowed expansive liability under Section 11 for statements of opinion. The Supreme Court held that an opinion may give

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from