Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 22 MARCH 2012

Supreme Court Decision Alert - March 21, 2012

Mayer Brown
Mayer Brown
Contributor
Mayer Brown

Mayer Brown

Mayer Brown is a leading international law firm positioned to represent the world’s major...

View firm profile
Explore more from Mayer Brown

Although the Administrative Procedure Act ("APA") generally provides for judicial review of final agency actions, an APA challenge cannot be maintained if the agency acts under a statute that expressly or implicitly "preclude[s] judicial review."

United StatesLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Originally published March 21, 2012

Keywords: Clean Water Act, pre-enforcement review, Administrative Procedure Act, APA, EPA, judicial review

Today the Supreme Court issued one decision, described below, of interest to the business community.

Clean Water Act—Pre-Enforcement Review

Sackett v. Environmental Protection Agency, No. 10-1062 (previously discussed in the June 28, 2011 Docket Report).

Although the Administrative Procedure Act ("APA") generally provides for judicial review of final agency actions, an APA challenge cannot be maintained if the agency acts under a statute that expressly or implicitly "preclude[s] judicial review." 5 U.S.C. § 701(a)(1). Today, the Supreme Court held in Sackett v. EPA, No. 10-1062, that the Clean Water Act ("CWA") does not bar landowners who receive a compliance order issued by the Environmental Protection Agency ("EPA") from bringing a pre-enforcement suit under the APA to challenge the agency's jurisdiction.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from