Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 04 DECEMBER 2013

Supreme Court Decision Alert - December 3, 2013

Mayer Brown
Mayer Brown
Contributor
Mayer Brown

Mayer Brown

Mayer Brown is a leading international law firm positioned to represent the world’s major...

View firm profile
Explore more from Mayer Brown

Yesterday the Supreme Court issued two decisions, described below, of interest to the business community.

United StatesLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Yesterday (December 3, 2013) the Supreme Court issued two decisions, described below, of interest to the business community.

  • Taxation—Penalties for Overstating Basis—District Court Jurisdiction
  • Forum-Selection Clauses—Proper Venue—Transfer Between Districts

Taxation—Penalties for Overstating Basis—District Court Jurisdiction

United States v. Woods, No. 12-562 (previously discussed in the March 25, 2013, Docket Report)

Section 6662(e) of the Internal Revenue Code imposes a penalty for an underpayment of income tax that is "attributable to" an overstatement of the value or basis of property. Today, the Supreme Court, in a unanimous opinion by Justice Scalia, held that the overstatement penalty is applicable to an underpayment resulting from a basis-inflating transaction subsequently disregarded for lack of economic substance. The Court also decided that district courts have jurisdiction to consider the applicability of tax penalties in

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from