Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 25 JUNE 2014

Sixth Circuit Vacates Lower Court Judgment And Awards Website Operator Immunity

In August of 2013, this blog wrote about the case Jones v. Dirty World Entertainment Recordings, LLC, 965 F. Supp. 2d 818 (E.D. Ky. 2013).

United StatesLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Richard Raysman is a Partner in the New York office

In August of 2013, this blog wrote about the case Jones v. Dirty World Entertainment Recordings, LLC, 965 F. Supp. 2d 818 (E.D. Ky. 2013) ("Jones I"). As described then, Jones I dealt with the following set of facts:

[T]he plaintiff (Jones), a cheerleader for the Cincinnati Bengals, requested that defendant's (Richie) website "thedirty.com" remove highly negative posts about her alleged intimate relationships. When the defendant refused, the plaintiff sued for defamation and libel per se, among other claims. In response, the defendant website operator claimed immunity under Section 230 of the [Communications Decency Act (CDA)].

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from