Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 03 APRIL 2024

Shining A Light On The Importance Of Article III Standing In Class Settlements

In Smith v. Miorelli, the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit reminded litigants of the importance of Article III standing, even where the parties agree to settle.

United StatesLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

KEY TAKEAWAY: 

In Smith v.  Miorelli, the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit reminded litigants of the importance of Article III standing, even where the parties agree to settle. Federal courts do not have authority to adjudicate a claim or to award a specific form of relief unless the plaintiff first satisfies this jurisdictional requirement. 

On February 26, 2024, the Eleventh Circuit invalidated a settlement agreement reached by the parties to resolve a trio of class action lawsuits against major sunglasses manufacturer, Costa Del Mar, Inc.1 Without reaching any other arguments raised by the unnamed class-member objectors on appeal, the court voided the settlement because the named plaintiffs sought—but did not establish Article III standing entitling them to—injunctive relief.2 

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from