Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 04 MARCH 2019

Settling A False Claims Act Case? Be Sure To Read The Fine Print!

Arnold & Porter
Arnold & Porter
Contributor
Arnold & Porter

Arnold & Porter

With over 1,000 lawyers across 16 offices worldwide, Arnold & Porter is renowned for its...

View firm profile
Explore more from Arnold & Porter

The Eastern District of New York recently had to implement corrective measures when the parties in a Federal False Claims Act (FCA) ...

United StatesLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

The Eastern District of New York recently had to implement corrective measures when the parties in a Federal False Claims Act (FCA) proceeding settled too much. Specifically, they inadvertently agreed to settle away claims of another party that had not joined the settlement.

The court was presented with a proposed Stipulation of Dismissal and Order to resolve FCA proceedings in United States v. AMERISOURCEBERGEN, et al., 2019 WL 624921 (Feb. 6, 2019). Careful monitors of our running list of FCA recoveries will recognize this as the single highest recovery of FY2018 coming in at more than $580 million, and one that DOJ hurried to finalize just as the fiscal year came to a close. In the rush to get this one in the books, the parties apparently failed to notice that they were settling away claims that were not in fact theirs to settle.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from