Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 01 MARCH 2011

Section 337 Update: Prosecution Bar Denied For Failure To File Timely Motion

Steptoe LLP
Steptoe LLP
Contributor
Steptoe LLP

Steptoe LLP

Steptoe International (UK) LLP has built a strong reputation for providing top-quality regulatory,...

View firm profile
Explore more from Steptoe LLP

During the course of a Section 337 investigation before the US International Trade Commission ("ITC"), a party’s confidential information is normally disclosed to opposing counsel and experts for the other side as part of the discovery process, under the terms of a Protective Order governing use of confidential information.

United StatesLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

During the course of a Section 337 investigation before the US International Trade Commission ("ITC"), a party's confidential information is normally disclosed to opposing counsel and experts for the other side as part of the discovery process, under the terms of a Protective Order governing use of confidential information.  Due in part to the complexity of current technology, it is not uncommon for a party's litigation counsel or expert witnesses to also represent or assist the party in patent prosecution matters.  Consequently, to avoid the risk that opposing counsel or experts may use confidential information disclosed in an ITC investigation during subsequent or concurrent patent prosecution, a party may seek to amend the governing Protective Order to include a prosecution bar.  

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from