Reversing itself in a 7-4 en banc decision, the Ninth
Circuit reinstated a $210 million settlement in multidistrict class
action litigation over the advertised fuel efficiency of Hyundai
and Kia vehicles, making approval of nationwide class action
settlements easier. In re Hyundai and Kia Fuel Economy
Litigation, 2019 U.S. App. LEXIS 17047 at *5 (9th Cir. 2019).
In its decision, the Ninth Circuit applied a lower standard to Rule
23(b)(3) predominance analysis in the settlement context—as
opposed to a contested class certification motion—for issues
of choice-of-law and reliance under state consumer protection
statutes. Judge Ikuta argues in dissent that this may not be
consistent with controlling Supreme Court precedent, Amchem
Prods., Inc. v. Windsor, 521 U.S. 591, 623 (1997).