Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 25 JUNE 2025

New York Court Ruling Ends "One Free Bite" Rule

On April 17, 2025, the New York Court of Appeals issued a landmark ruling in Flanders v. Goodfellow, fundamentally changing how the state handles dog bite liability.

United StatesLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

On April 17, 2025, the New York Court of Appeals issued a landmark ruling in Flanders v. Goodfellow, fundamentally changing how the state handles dog bite liability. In a unanimous decision, the court eliminated the long-standing, so-called "one free bite" rule, allowing victims to bring negligence claims even if the dog had no prior history of aggression. This shift marks a major change in how responsibility is assessed and has far-reaching consequences for both dog owners and injury victims.

Until now, New York followed a strict liability model requiring victims to prove that a dog had "vicious propensities" and that the owner knew, or should have known, about them. That typically meant showing a prior bite or documented aggression. Without that proof, victims were often out of luck.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from