Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 02 APRIL 2012

Loser Pays Most Electronic Discovery Costs? Not So Fast

A recent opinion vacating most of the electronic discovery costs affirmed in Race Tires II provides clarity in the Third Circuit as to the limited scope of electronic discovery costs recoverable by a prevailing civil party.

United StatesLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
Jacquelyn Caridad
Jacquelyn Caridad
Tara Lawler
Tara Lawler
Scott Milner
Scott Milner
Lorraine Casto
Lorraine Casto

A recent opinion vacating most of the electronic discovery costs affirmed inRace Tires II provides clarity in the Third Circuit as to the limited scope of electronic discovery costs recoverable by a prevailing civil party.

The rapidly evolving area of the law regarding whether a prevailing party can recoup electronic discovery costs recently reversed course in the Third Circuit. In Race Tires America, Inc. v. Hoosier Racing Tire Corp. (Race Tires III),1 the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit sought to provide "definitive guidance" on "the extent to which electronic discovery expenses are taxable" and vacated the majority of a $365,000 award of electronic discovery–related costs. The court of appeals found that less than 10% of the costs the district court awarded for electronic discovery charges were in fact taxable, eliminating more than $335,000 of the award. The court of appeals allowed recovery only for the costs it deemed equivalent to "making copies"

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from