Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 02 JULY 2026

How To Skip The Litigation Line: Protecting Rights To Judicial Reference In California

Commercial litigation in California faces significant challenges including congested court calendars, unpredictable jury verdicts, and the limitations of arbitration. This article examines judicial reference as an underutilized alternative dispute resolution mechanism that combines the benefits of court trials with the efficiency of private proceedings, while exploring how parties can preserve their contractual rights to this process.

United StatesLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Judicial reference is a lesser-known alternative to traditional litigation or arbitration in order to resolve contractual disputes, where parties appoint a private referee to decide the case. Best understood as a hybrid of a court trial and arbitration, judicial reference offers several advantages that make it an efficient and often more desirable dispute resolution mechanism.

Commercial disputes in California are expensive, time-consuming, and unpredictable. Jury trials, in particular, carry the risk of large, unforeseeable verdicts. Court calendars in major California counties remain congested. In FY 2023-2024, there were 4.8 million total cases filed with only 2013 judges sitting on the bench.1 This means judges have an average of 2,430 cases each. During that same time frame over 98,000 unlimited civil cases (cases over $25,000 at issue) were filed in Los Angeles County alone.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from