Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 03 MARCH 2025

HK Security Of Payment Ordinance: What Difference Might It Make In Practice?

Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner
Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner
Contributor
Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner

Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner

UK 2026 Chambers Firm Profile Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner (BCLP) is an international, fully...

View firm profile
Explore more from Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner

In Wang & Lee Contracting Ltd v Young Kwong Pui Trading as In Tech Engineering [2025] HKDC 66 (Date of Decision: 3 January 2025)...

United StatesLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Summary

In Wang & Lee Contracting Ltd v Young Kwong Pui Trading as In Tech Engineering [2025] HKDC 66 (Date of Decision: 3 January 2025), the District Court ordered the court proceedings to be stayed and that the plaintiff's claims be referred to arbitration.

The court's decision to grant a stay in favour of arbitration is entirely unsurprising and is consistent with Hong Kong courts' pro-arbitration stance. What this article will explore is how this dispute might have proceeded along a different trajectory if the newly enacted Construction Industry Security of Payment Ordinance (Cap 652) ("Ordinance") had been in force and applied to this dispute and the facts leading up to it.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from