Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 16 DECEMBER 2020

Halliburton v Chubb: Supreme Court Rules On Arbitrator Impartiality

In a long-awaited decision, the Supreme Court has recently handed down a judgment of critical importance addressing an arbitrator's duty of impartiality and obligation to make disclosure.

United StatesLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

In a long-awaited decision, the Supreme Court has recently handed down a judgment of critical importance addressing an arbitrator's duty of impartiality and obligation to make disclosure.

The case relates to the Deepwater Horizon incident and claims made by two insureds, Halliburton and Transocean, on their Bermuda Form policies with Chubb. An experienced commercial arbitrator, Kenneth Rokison QC, was appointed as third arbitrator by the Commercial Court in an arbitration commenced by Halliburton under its policy, seeking payment of its claim. Mr. Rokison subsequently accepted an appointment as arbitrator in an arbitration commenced by Transocean under its policy. Although he informed Transocean of the Halliburton appointment prior to acceptance, on accepting the appointment in the Transocean arbitration, Mr. Rokison did not disclose his appointment to Halliburton. When Halliburton discovered the Transocean appointment, it applied to the Court to seek to remove Mr.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from