Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 07 OCTOBER 2016

Guidance On Deceptive Advertising Claims From 9th Circuit

Akin
Akin
Contributor
Akin

Akin

Akin is a global law firm with more than 1,100 lawyers and advisors who pride themselves on...

View firm profile
Explore more from Akin

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit found that Dole's "All Natural" food labels on products containing synthetic ingredients could be misleading to a reasonable consumer.

United StatesLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Key Points

  • The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit found that Dole's "All Natural" food labels on products containing synthetic ingredients could be misleading to a reasonable consumer.
  • The 9th Circuit confirmed that the proper measure of damages for the plaintiff's claims is the "price premium" attributable to Dole's "All Natural" food labels—i.e., the difference between amount paid and the value of the product purchased—since the plaintiff failed to prove that Dole's products were worthless.
  • The 9th Circuit also affirmed the district court's order decertifying the Rule 23(b)(3) damages class because the plaintiff had not shown that damages could be calculated with common proof, making the price premium measure of damages unsuitable for class treatment.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from