Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 18 APRIL 2016

Foreclosure Standing – Another Evidentiary Trap for the Unwary Lender

Fox Rothschild LLP
Fox Rothschild LLP
Contributor
Explore more from Fox Rothschild LLP

It looks like standing is the flavor of the month in foreclosure defense and the issue that lenders need to make sure that they are addressing at trial.

United StatesLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

It looks like standing is the flavor of the month in foreclosure defense and the issue that lenders need to make sure that they are addressing at trial. Two recent Florida appellate court decisions highlight this issue.

In Michael Sorrell v. U.S. Bank National Association, Fla. 2d DCA Case No. 2D14-3883 (Apr. 6, 2016), Florida's Second District Court of Appeal reversed a final judgment of foreclosure based upon a finding that the lender's "evidence was legally insufficient to prove that it had standing when it filed the Complaint."  The note that was attached to the complaint (which was payable to the original lender, was not endorsed, and did not include an allonge) and the mortgage that was attached to the complaint were both in favor of the original lender.  The plaintiff filed an amended complaint with an assignment of the mortgage attached, but no additional documents related to the note, and the borrower asserted a defense of lack of standing.  The plaintiff

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from