Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 28 SEPTEMBER 2017

Expert Witness Summer 2017, Vol. 13, Issue 1

Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.
Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.
Contributor
Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.

Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.

Mintz is a litigation powerhouse and business accelerator serving leaders in life sciences, private...

View firm profile
Explore more from Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.

Logically, the expert is often the best person to help counsel identify the information that is relevant to formulating the expert's own opinion.

United StatesLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
Mintz Levin Litigation Group
Mintz Levin Litigation Group
Author LinkedIn connections

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Paxil Case: Daubert Analysis Excludes Medical Causation Expert

By James P. Ray

The court found insufficient evidence of the plaintiff's exposure to Paxil, which was necessary to support the expert's opinion on specific causation.

Lawyer or Client: Does It Matter Who Hires the Expert?

By Davis B. "Pepper" Allgood

Most of the time, having the lawyer obligate himself or herself for the expert's fees will confer no advantage in the litigation.

Hot-Tubbing of Experts in Arbitration

By Gilbert Samberg

"Hot-tubbing" is a novel method of presenting expert oral testimony in conference that gives increased responsibilities and control to the witnesses and the arbitrators, and requires counsel to prepare their expert witnesses accordingly.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from