Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 08 JULY 2022

The Return To Office Battle Continues

Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.
Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.
Contributor
Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.

Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.

Mintz is a litigation powerhouse and business accelerator serving leaders in life sciences, private...

View firm profile
Explore more from Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.

Surveys show that two-thirds of the workforce reported that they would consider looking for a new job if they were required to return to the office full-time.

United StatesLaw Practice Management

This week, the Boston Globe and Fortune reported on the ongoing return to office battle between employers (many of whom are seeking a robust return to pre-pandemic work models without further delay) and employees (many of whom are pushing back in meaningful ways, including by voting with their feet, given the increased flexibility and independence they experienced over the past few years). The Globe's headline?: "It's really a mess."

Surveys show that two-thirds of the workforce reported that they would consider looking for a new job if they were required to return to the office full-time. Workers' sentiments with this level of volume can't simply be ignored by employers who are vying for new talent and focused on retaining existing talent -- but employers must also not lose sight of their operational needs and their cultural objectives. From a legal perspective, employers need to ensure that similar types of employees are treated consistently when

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from