Earlier this month, a Law360 article explored a
fundamental—yet often overlooked—question: whether the
long-held standard practice of tallying pro bono hours remains
"the best way to measure pro bono success." Though
attempting to approximate a firm's commitment to pro bono
through quantifiable metrics is laudable, hours alone do not tell
the full story. Especially given that half of those seeking legal aid assistance are
turned away due to a lack of resources, a firm should not lose
sight of the fundamental (albeit less measurable) purpose of pro
bono work, which is to maximize access to justice in under-served
communities.
A growing body of empirical research aims to address the
scarcity of legal services for the poor in the United States. For
example, consider Professor Jim Greiner, a leading scholar in the
space, who founded the Access to Justice Lab at Harvard Law School in
2016. Unlike most research into the practice of law,
Greiner employs Randomized Control