Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 04 NOVEMBER 2019

WYHA? TTAB Affirms Section 2(e)(5) Functionality Refusal Of Packaging For Cables And Wire

Wolf Greenfield & Sacks
Wolf Greenfield & Sacks
Contributor
Explore more from Wolf Greenfield & Sacks

In a thorough, 39-page opinion, the Board affirmed a Section 2(e)(5) functionality refusal of the packaging designs shown below for "electrical cables and wire."

United StatesIntellectual Property

In a thorough, 39-page opinion, the Board affirmed a Section 2(e)(5) functionality refusal of the packaging designs shown below for "electrical cables and wire." The Board found that numerous features of the designs were "dictated by the utilitarian purpose they serve." Moreover, applicant's own patents revealed "the functionality of significant aspects of the design," and its advertising touted some of the features. Alternatively, the Board concluded that the packaging designs are not inherently distinctive and lack acquired distinctiveness. Would you have appealed? In re My Reelex Packaging Solutions, Inc., Serial Nos. 87285383 and 87285412 (October 23, 2019) [not precedential] (Opinion by Deputy Chief Judge Mark A. Thurmon).

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from