Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 09 MAY 2017

Without Volitional Conduct, Establishing Direct Copyright Infringement Gets Hairy

The Fifth Circuit affirmed the district court's grant of summary judgment, determining that volitional conduct is required to prove a claim of direct infringement.

United StatesIntellectual Property

The US Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit affirmed the district court's grant of summary judgment, holding that "volitional conduct" is required to establish a claim for direct copyright infringement under the safe harbor provision of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA). BWP Media USA, Incorporated, et al. v. T & S Software Associates, Inc., Case No. 16-10510 (5th Cir., Mar. 27, 2017) (Southwick, J).

T & S Software, an internet service provider (ISP), hosted an internet forum called HairTalk on which third-party users posted various images, shared comments, asked questions and posted other content on topics that include hair, beauty and celebrities. BWP Media sued T & S claiming that a third-party HairTalk user posted images that infringed BWP's copyrights. BWP argued that during the relevant time period, T & S did not have an agent designated to receive notices of content that should be removed, as required to qualify for the DMCA statutory safe harbor.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from