Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 24 MAY 2023

Which Of The Proposed PTAB Reforms Will Stick?

Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
Contributor
Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP

Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP

Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP is one of the world’s largest firms focusing on...

View firm profile
Explore more from Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP

The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office's recent advance notice of proposed rulemaking for potential reforms to the rules and guidelines for America Invents Act trials was not short...

United StatesIntellectual Property

The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office's recent advance notice of proposed rulemaking for potential reforms to the rules and guidelines for America Invents Act trials was not short on ideas for potential modifications to the way in which the PTAB conducts AIA trials.1

The notice's extensive list of proposals, now open to comment by USPTO stakeholders, was described by some members of the U.S. House of Representatives' Subcommittee on Courts, Intellectual Property and the Internet — at a recent oversight hearing on April 27 — as crossing over into the purview of Congress.

Specifically, Rep. Zoe Lofgren, D-Calif., told USPTO Director Kathi Vidal that Congress can revisit the statute to consider changes but "the PTO is not a lawmaking body."2 Vidal responded by noting that this advanced notice "was a way to give stakeholders a chance to shape the rules."3

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from