Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 26 SEPTEMBER 2016

Wearable Activity Tracking Devices: Commission Partially Vacates And Remands Section 101 Ruling

Morrison Foerster
Morrison Foerster
Contributor
Morrison Foerster

Morrison Foerster

With approximately 1,000 lawyers in 19 offices, Morrison & Foerster is a preeminent global law firm...

View firm profile
Explore more from Morrison Foerster

On September 7, 2016, the Commission partially vacated and remanded Administrative Law Judge Pender's Initial Determination that the three patents-in-suit in the 973 Investigation were invalid under Section 101.

United StatesIntellectual Property

On September 7, 2016, the Commission partially vacated and remanded Administrative Law Judge Pender's Initial Determination (ID) that the three patents-in-suit in the 973 Investigation (Wearable Activity Tracking Devices) were invalid under Section 101.

Fitbit, Inc. brought this investigation, alleging infringement of three of its patents: U.S. Patent No. 8,920,332 ("the '332 patent"); U.S. Patent No. 8,868,377 ("the '377 patent"); and U.S. Patent No. 9,089,760 ("the '760 patent"). Respondents moved for summary determination that all three patents were invalid under Section 101. The OUII investigative attorney filed a response supporting Respondents' motion as to the '760 patent but opposing as to the '332 and '377.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from