Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 03 NOVEMBER 2021

US Court Rules Artificial Intelligence Systems Are Not 'Inventors'

On September 2, 2021, the US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia granted the United States Patent and Trademark Office's (USPTO's) motion

United StatesIntellectual Property
Rahul Kapoor
Rahul Kapoor
Shokoh Yaghoubi
Shokoh Yaghoubi

On September 2, 2021, the US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia granted the United States Patent and Trademark Office's (USPTO's) motion for summary judgement, finding that an artificial intelligence (AI) system cannot be named as an inventor on a patent.

The action concerned two patent applications that Stephen Thaler had filed with the USPTO, which he alleged should not have been rejected by the Office. The USPTO had rejected the applications on the basis that no natural person was identified as an inventor. Thaler argued that a patent application for an AI-generated invention should list the AI system as the inventor when the AI system has met the invention criteria. Thaler alleged that he developed and applied advanced AI systems that are capable of generating patentable output under conditions where no natural person traditionally meets inventorship criteria. Thaler is the owner of "DABUS," an AI machine that "invented" a light beacon that

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

This article is provided as a general informational service and it should not be construed as imparting legal advice on any specific matter.

See more popular content from