Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 15 JUNE 2020

TTABlog Test: Is "BARE" For Sausage Confusable With "JUST BARE" For Poultry?

Wolf Greenfield & Sacks
Wolf Greenfield & Sacks
Contributor
Explore more from Wolf Greenfield & Sacks

The USPTO refused to register the mark BARE for "skinless beef sausage, skinless pork sausage; beef; pork; hamburger; beef snack sticks; processed pork, veal and beef,"

United StatesIntellectual Property
The USPTO refused to register the mark BARE for "skinless beef sausage, skinless pork sausage; beef; pork; hamburger; beef snack sticks; processed pork, veal and beef," finding a likelihood of confusion with the registered mark JUST BARE, in standard character and design form (below), for poultry and processed chicken. Applicant Mello Meats argued that the word JUST distinguishes the two marks, and as to the goods, there are many entities that register and use their marks for only one type of meat product. How do you think this came out? In re Mello Meats Inc., Serial No. 87624232 (June 8, 2020) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Jonathan Hudis).

952908.jpg
The Marks: Examining Attorney Christine Martin maintained that the marks BARE and JUST BARE are similar in sound, appearance, and commercial impression. Consumers are likely to view applicant's mark, with the elimination of the word "JUST," as a variation of the cited mark. As to the cited word-plus-design mark, the

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from