Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 06 APRIL 2021

TTABlog Test: Are These Marks Confusingly Similar For Waterpark Services?

Wolf Greenfield & Sacks
Wolf Greenfield & Sacks
Contributor
Explore more from Wolf Greenfield & Sacks

The USPTO refused registration of the mark THE KARTRITE and the word+design mark shown first below, for a raft of goods and services...

United StatesIntellectual Property

The USPTO refused registration of the mark THE KARTRITE and the word+design mark shown first below, for a raft of goods and services in classes 12, 14, 16, 18, 20, 21, 25, 28, 35, 41, 43, and 44, including "providing waterpark services," finding a likelihood of confusion with the registered mark AQUATOPIA KARTRITE'S EPIC ADVENTURES + Design, shown second below, for "indoor waterpark services." On appeal, the Board found some of the involved goods and services to be related, but what about the marks? Are they confusingly similar? In re Catskill Resorts TRS, LLC, Serial Nos. 88337961 and 88338045 (March 31, 2021) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Christopher Larkin).

1054640.jpg

1054640a.jpg

The Board, unsurprisingly, found that the word "Aquatopia" is the dominant portion of the cited mark because "it comprises the largest literal portion of the mark in terms of size, position, and emphasis," and because it "is also the first term in the mark, further establishing

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from