Last month, the US Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB) found
that the mark BIG SIX was generic for wine and upheld the Examining
Attorney's refusal to register the mark as a result. Plata Wine
Partners filed an intent-to-use application to register BIG SIX for
wines in January 2017. The Examining Attorney initially refused
registration under Section 2(e)(1) on the ground that BIG SIX was a
term of art in the wine industry, and thus descriptive of wine. The
Examining Attorney also found that BIG SIX was generic, and
therefore incapable of functioning as a source identifier, for
wine. In response, Applicant submitted an allegation of use and
amended its application to the Supplemental Register—the
trademark register designed for descriptive marks that have the
potential to be source identifiers. The Examining Attorney then
refused registration under Section 23(c) of the Lanham Act, on the
ground that BIG SIX is generic for wine and, alternatively, that it
is