Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 25 AUGUST 2020

TTAB Denies Motion To Re-open Concurrent Use Proceeding To Remove Geographical Restriction

Wolf Greenfield & Sacks
Wolf Greenfield & Sacks
Contributor
Wolf Greenfield & Sacks

Wolf Greenfield & Sacks

Wolf, Greenfield is one of the 10 largest law firms in the United States devoted exclusively to...

View firm profile
Explore more from Wolf Greenfield & Sacks

The Board denied TMC's motion to re-open this 1997 concurrent use proceeding involving the mark ON THE RUN...

United StatesIntellectual Property

The Board denied TMC's motion to re-open this 1997 concurrent use proceeding involving the mark ON THE RUN for retail convenience store services. TMC obtained a concurrent use registration for the entire United States except for the state of Oklahoma. It sought to remove that geographical restriction from its registration on the ground that, according to its evidence, Ronald D. Donohue, the excepted concurrent user, is no longer using his common law mark. TMC Franchise Corp. v. Ronald D. Donohue, Concurrent Use No. 94001076 (August 20, 2020) [not precedential].

978966.jpg

The Board observed that a party may seek an amendment to the concurrent use restriction in its registration only through a new concurrent use proceeding, or by court order. However, removal may be permitted if the excepted user has assigned its rights to registrant. See In re Alfred Dunhill, 4 USPQ2d 1383,1384 (Comm'r 1987).

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from