Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 28 OCTOBER 2024

Trending At The PTAB: Evolution Of Granting Stays Post-AIA

Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
Contributor
Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP

Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP

Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP is one of the world’s largest firms focusing on...

View firm profile
Explore more from Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP

The America Invents Act gives the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office director authority to stay a reexamination or reissue proceeding, pursuant to Title 35 of the U.S. Code, Section 315(d).

United StatesIntellectual Property

The America Invents Act gives the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office director authority to stay a reexamination or reissue proceeding, pursuant to Title 35 of the U.S. Code, Section 315(d).

This article will discuss the trend of how the board exercises this power and responds to motions to stay, and how they may affect Patent Trial and Appeal Board practice.

Background

The amended AIA provides that in an inter partes review, the director may, at their discretion, stay, transfer, consolidate or terminate any parallel matter before the USPTO.

Accordingly, Title 37 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Section 42.122(a), provides this power to the PTAB, authorizing the board to “enter any appropriate order regarding the additional matter including providing for the stay, transfer, consolidation, or termination of any such matter.”

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from