Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 08 JULY 2014

Trademark Registration Refused Because It Contained Disparaging Matter

Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
Contributor
Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP

Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP

Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP is one of the world’s largest firms focusing on...

View firm profile
Explore more from Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP

Specifically, the TTAB found that "Islamisation" had two likely meanings: a religious meaning and a political meaning.

United StatesIntellectual Property

In In re Geller, No. 13-1412 (Fed. Cir. May 13, 2014), the Federal Circuit affirmed the TTAB's refusal to register STOP THE ISLAMISATION OF AMERICA because the mark contained "matter which may disparage" a group of persons in violation of § 2(a) of the Lanham Act.  Slip op. at 1-2.

In 2010, Pamela Geller and Robert B. Spencer (collectively "Appellants") filed an intent-to-use application to register the mark STOP THE ISLAMISATION OF AMERICA for "[p]roviding information regarding understanding and preventing terrorism."  Id. at 2 (alteration in original) (citation omitted).  The Examining Attorney refused the mark on the ground that it may disparage American Muslims in violation of § 2(a) of the Lanham Act.  Appellants then filed an appeal, and the TTAB affirmed.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from