Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 28 OCTOBER 2015

The Devil (And The Copyright) Is In The Details

Would-be filmmakers often see the ghostly reflection of their own work in allegedly infringing films that actually get made.

United StatesIntellectual Property

Would-be filmmakers often see the ghostly reflection of their own work in allegedly infringing films that actually get made. With many such copyright claims, the devil is – figuratively – in the details, but in the recent case of Brown v. Twentieth Century Fox, the satanic details were quite literal.

Last year, a film called Devil's Due premiered. It was greeted by unappreciative reviews, unenthusiastic audiences and then by a lawsuit.  With a whopping 18% rating on Rotten Tomatoes, the critical consensus was that the film was "derivative and mostly uninspired."  One viewer, Rhonda Kay Jackson Brown, believed that she knew what the film was derivative of: specifically, her self-published novel Jackson Road and her adapted screenplay Mother's Son. So she filed a pro se complaint for copyright infringement in the Eastern District of Kentucky.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from