Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 14 JULY 2026

The $107.5 Million Dosage Gap: Enablement Lessons From Wyeth v. AstraZeneca

On July 9, the federal circuit issued a decision in Wyeth LLC v. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP, affirming a district court's grant of judgment as a matter of law ("JMOL") invalidating Wyeth's asserted claims...

United StatesIntellectual Property

On July 9, the federal circuit issued a decision in Wyeth LLC v. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP, affirming a district court's grant of judgment as a matter of law ("JMOL") invalidating Wyeth's asserted claims in U.S. Patents 10,603,314 and 10,596,162 for lack of enablement under 35 U.S.C. § 112(a). The case arose from Wyeth's infringement suit against AstraZeneca over Tagrisso(R) (osimertinib), an irreversible EGFR inhibitor used to treat gefitinib/erlotinib-resistant non-small cell lung cancer. A jury had initially found the patents not invalid and awarded Wyeth $107.5 million in damages, but the district court overturned that verdict post-trial.

The asserted claims recited a method of treating resistant lung cancer by administering a daily "unit dosage" of an irreversible EGFR inhibitor that covalently binds to specific cysteine residues. The specification defined "unit dosage" as a "physically discrete unit... containing a predetermined quantity of active material calculated to

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from