Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 08 OCTOBER 2019

Spotlight On Upcoming Oral Arguments – October 2019

Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
Contributor
Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP

Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP

Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP is one of the world’s largest firms focusing on...

View firm profile
Explore more from Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP

The Court has been asked to consider whether the PTAB has the discretion to properly disregard evidence that is deficient in certain technical requirements.

United StatesIntellectual Property

Evolved Wireless LLC v. ZTE (USA) Inc.., No. 18-2008, Dallas, Texas

The Court has been asked to consider whether the PTAB has the discretion to properly disregard evidence that is deficient in certain technical requirements.  Evolved is the owner of U.S. Patent No. 7,881,236 (“the '236 patent”), which discloses an invention that improves upon prior art mobile telephone systems.  In an IPR challenging the validity of the '236 patent, Evolved submitted an expert declaration to support the validity of its patent.  The Board declined to give any weight to Evolved's expert declaration because it failed to include language that the statements were submitted “under the penalty of perjury.” The Board reasoned that to give the declaration any weight would “thwart the purpose” of the rules regarding affidavit or declaration evidence, and ultimately found the '236 patent invalid as obvious.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from